Logo
  • Home
  • Ask
  • Teen Help Network
  • About
    • About Judge Tom
    • Books
    • FAQs
    • Press Room
  • Your Rights
    • Crime and Punishment
    • Student Rights at School
    • You and Your Body
    • You and the Internet
    • Juvenile Justice System
    • LGBT Youth Rights
    • More Categories
  • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Videos
    • A Teenager’s Guide to Juvenile Court
    • Books
    • Research & Resources
  • Newsletter Signup

 

Q&A

Know your rights! Youth justice and juvenile law answers.

Askthejudge.info features regular updates from the news, important decisions from the nation′s courts, and online discussions with Judge Tom. Find out everything you need to know about youth rights, juvenile law and juvenile justice. AsktheJudge – Empowering youth one question at a time.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this site is made available to the general public and is not intended to serve as legal advice.You should consult a trained legal professional in your area for questions you may have about the laws affecting juveniles or any legal interpretations.

Copyright, 2014
Logo
May 20, 2015
Judge Tom
Blog
0

8th grader’s Facebook rant against teacher is “protected speech”

PreviousNext
Digital disobedience and free speech

That’s right – a federal district court judge in Oregon called Braeden Burge’s off-campus posts an attempt to elicit a response from his friends, not a serious threat against the teacher.

Braeden, an eighth-grader at Colton Middle School in Oregon, was upset at receiving a C from his health teacher, Veronica Bouck. He posted comments on his private computer and Facebook page on a day when school wasn’t in session. He referred to her as a “bitch” who “needs to be shot.” He wanted to start a petition to get her fired since she was “the worst teacher ever.”

Digital disobedience and free speech

Photo by s.t.a.r.k. (Flickr)

When questioned by the police about his posts, Braeden admitted what he wrote but meant no harm to anyone. He explained that he only wanted to get a response from his friends “just to see what they thought about it.” Braeden was given a 3 1/2 day in-school suspension.

Following the Tinker test of “substantial disruption,” the federal judge found that Braeden’s writings did not cause “a widespread whispering campaign at school” and that no students missed school or teachers missed work due to his comments. The police weren’t notified and no further investigation was undertaken by the school. Braeden’s First Amendment rights had been violated.

The court ordered the suspension be removed from Braeden’s school record and that he (and his parents) be reimbursed for their legal expenses.

 

 

digital rightsfreedom of speechrights at school
Share this
Judge Tom

The Author Judge Tom

Judge Tom is the founder and moderator of AsktheJudge.info. He is a retired juvenile judge and spent 23 years on the bench. He has written several books for lawyers and judges as well as teens and parents including 'Teen Cyberbullying Investigated' (Free Spirit Publishing) and 'Every Vote Matters: the Power of Your Voice, from Student Elections to the Supreme Court' (Free Spirit Publishing). In 2020, the American Bar Association published "Cyberbullying Law," the nation's first case-law book written for lawyers, judges and law students. When he's not answering teens' questions, Judge Tom volunteers with the American Red Cross and can be found hiking, traveling and reading.

Find great resources in our

Teen Help Network


Leave A Comment Cancel reply