Logo
  • Home
  • Ask
  • Teen Help Network
  • About
    • About Judge Tom
    • Books
    • FAQs
    • Press Room
  • Your Rights
    • Crime and Punishment
    • Student Rights at School
    • You and Your Body
    • You and the Internet
    • Juvenile Justice System
    • LGBT Youth Rights
    • More Categories
  • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Videos
    • A Teenager’s Guide to Juvenile Court
    • Books
    • Research & Resources
  • Newsletter Signup

 

Q&A

Know your rights! Youth justice and juvenile law answers.

Askthejudge.info features regular updates from the news, important decisions from the nation′s courts, and online discussions with Judge Tom. Find out everything you need to know about youth rights, juvenile law and juvenile justice. AsktheJudge – Empowering youth one question at a time.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this site is made available to the general public and is not intended to serve as legal advice.You should consult a trained legal professional in your area for questions you may have about the laws affecting juveniles or any legal interpretations.

Copyright, 2014
Logo
April 13, 2009
Judge Tom
Talk Back
1

Prosecutor sued by students in cellphone photo incident

PreviousNext

In an unusual twist in the war on sexting, Pennsylvania parents of three teenage girls filed a lawsuit against the local district attorney. 

   When Marissa Miller was 13, she was at a slumber party with her girlfriends. They took cellphone pictures of each other and thought nothing of it at the time. Two years later, the pictures surfaced on a phone that had been confiscated at school.

Marissa and a friend were photographed from the waist up wearing their bras. A third girl was photographed standing outside a shower with a bath towel wrapped around her body under her breasts.

The prosecutor told the girls they could avoid child pornography charges if they participated in a diversion program. They would need to attend education classes about pornography and sexual violence and submit to random drug testing. Otherwise conviction of child pornography carried the possibility of jail time and sex offender registration. A dozen other students caught sexting had accepted a similar offer.

Marissa, her friends and their mothers thought the offer was unfair and illegal. In their lawsuit against the prosecutor, they asked the court for an order preventing the prosecutor from filing criminal charges against the girls. The federal court issued an order temporarily stopping any action by the state until the case could be reviewed at a future hearing.

Update:  Arguments in the case were presented to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia on January 15, 2010. This case is believed to be the first of its kind in the country challenging the constitutionality of child pornography charges in the context of sexting. On March 17, 2010 the full court issued a unanimous decision in favor of the girls. They said the prosecutor overstepped his bounds and violated the parent’s due process rights to raise their children.

See the full story about this case and lawsuit here.

 

sexting
Share this
Judge Tom

The Author Judge Tom

Judge Tom is the founder and moderator of AsktheJudge.info. He is a retired juvenile judge and spent 23 years on the bench. He has written several books for lawyers and judges as well as teens and parents including 'Teen Cyberbullying Investigated' (Free Spirit Publishing) and 'Every Vote Matters: the Power of Your Voice, from Student Elections to the Supreme Court' (Free Spirit Publishing). In 2020, the American Bar Association published "Cyberbullying Law," the nation's first case-law book written for lawyers, judges and law students. When he's not answering teens' questions, Judge Tom volunteers with the American Red Cross and can be found hiking, traveling and reading.

Find great resources in our

Teen Help Network


Leave A Comment Cancel reply

1 Comment

  • julie
    May 13, 2009 8:43 pm count( 0 )

    per group, the boys feel that the prosecutor went overboard, as the girls consented to the actions and should not be charged with child pronography, as it was their choice and they did not send or post the pics anywhere-they feel the girls should be offered treatment/education