Logo
  • Home
  • Ask
  • Teen Help Network
  • About
    • About Judge Tom
    • Books
    • FAQs
    • Press Room
  • Your Rights
    • Crime and Punishment
    • Student Rights at School
    • You and Your Body
    • You and the Internet
    • Juvenile Justice System
    • LGBT Youth Rights
    • More Categories
  • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Videos
    • A Teenager’s Guide to Juvenile Court
    • Books
    • Research & Resources
  • Newsletter Signup

 

Q&A

Know your rights! Youth justice and juvenile law answers.

Askthejudge.info features regular updates from the news, important decisions from the nation′s courts, and online discussions with Judge Tom. Find out everything you need to know about youth rights, juvenile law and juvenile justice. AsktheJudge – Empowering youth one question at a time.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this site is made available to the general public and is not intended to serve as legal advice.You should consult a trained legal professional in your area for questions you may have about the laws affecting juveniles or any legal interpretations.

Copyright, 2014
Logo
September 24, 2012
Judge Tom
Blog
0

“Satan’s representative” wins $4.5 million verdict

PreviousNext
Photo of Armstrong from Shirvell's blog

Assistant Attorney General, Andrew Shirvell, of Michigan was sued by the University of Michigan student body president, Christopher Armstrong who graduated in 2011. In 2010, Shirvell launched an anti-gay blog to get Armstrong to resign. His website named “Chris Armstrong Watch” was allegedly defamatory and included such statements as referring to Armstrong as “Satan’s representative on the student assembly” and a “privileged pervert.” He accused Armstrong of promoting a “radical homosexual agenda” and hosting gay orgies in his dorm room.

Photo of Armstrong from Shirvell's blog

Photo of Armstrong from Shirvell's blog

Shirvell was terminated from his position in 2010. His immaturity was cited as part of the reason he was let go from the Attorney General’s Office. Shirvell maintained that his speech was protected by the First Amendment and was justified since Armstrong was a public figure. He denied being a bigot or a cyberbully.

Armstrong filed suit against Shirvell for defamation and causing emotional distress. Shirvell represented himself at trial. In August, 2012, the jury ruled in Armstrong’s favor returning a verdict of $4.5 million. Armstrong initially sought an apology and $25,000 in damages. But when Shirvell refused to admit that his actions were wrong or apologize, Armstrong and his lawyer decided to leave it to the jury. Shirvell will likely appeal the verdict.

There is a saying in law that a man who represents himself has a fool for a client.

As you know, cyberbullying isn’t limited to teenagers or young adults. Anyone can participate in sending thoughtless messages to others for a variety of reasons. Those using the Internet or a cell phone need to think before sending. The post becomes a permanent entry that can be retrieved and used as evidence in a court of law or in the court of public opinion. Emails, blogs and tweets can bite back.

cyberbullyingdigital rightsfreedom of speech
Share this
Judge Tom

The Author Judge Tom

Judge Tom is the founder and moderator of AsktheJudge.info. He is a retired juvenile judge and spent 23 years on the bench. He has written several books for lawyers and judges as well as teens and parents including 'Teen Cyberbullying Investigated' (Free Spirit Publishing) and 'Every Vote Matters: the Power of Your Voice, from Student Elections to the Supreme Court' (Free Spirit Publishing). In 2020, the American Bar Association published "Cyberbullying Law," the nation's first case-law book written for lawyers, judges and law students. When he's not answering teens' questions, Judge Tom volunteers with the American Red Cross and can be found hiking, traveling and reading.

Find great resources in our

Teen Help Network


Leave A Comment Cancel reply