Logo
  • Home
  • Ask
  • Teen Help Network
  • About
    • About Judge Tom
    • Books
    • FAQs
    • Press Room
  • Your Rights
    • Crime and Punishment
    • Student Rights at School
    • You and Your Body
    • You and the Internet
    • Juvenile Justice System
    • LGBT Youth Rights
    • More Categories
  • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Videos
    • A Teenager’s Guide to Juvenile Court
    • Books
    • Research & Resources
  • Newsletter Signup

 

Q&A

Know your rights! Youth justice and juvenile law answers.

Askthejudge.info features regular updates from the news, important decisions from the nation′s courts, and online discussions with Judge Tom. Find out everything you need to know about youth rights, juvenile law and juvenile justice. AsktheJudge – Empowering youth one question at a time.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this site is made available to the general public and is not intended to serve as legal advice.You should consult a trained legal professional in your area for questions you may have about the laws affecting juveniles or any legal interpretations.

Copyright, 2014
Logo
March 30, 2011
Judge Tom
Talk Back
0

Search of student returning to campus legal

PreviousNext

A Southern California high school has a policy authorizing the search of students who go off-campus during the school day. Parking lots and athletic fields are also considered out-of-bounds triggering a possible search.

Sean A. was present for some classes but missed others. When seen returning to campus, the assistant principal required him to empty his pockets. Sean was carrying a plastic bag with 44 Ecstasy pills. He was found guilty of possessing a controlled substance for sale and placed on probation.

Chris Breikss (Flickr)

Sean appealed the case and in December, 2010 the California Court of Appeals upheld the conviction. Sean argued that the rule discriminated against students who left campus and returned as opposed to those who came in the morning and didn’t leave until the end of the school day. In a 2-1 decision, the court ruled as follows: “Given the general applicaton of the policy to all students engaged in a form of rule violation that can easily lend itself to the introduction of drugs or weapons into the school environment, we conclude that further individualized suspicion was not required.” *

The court relied on two U.S. Supreme Court decisions involving 8th grade student James Acton of Oregon and high school student Lindsay Earls of Oklahoma in holding that the search did not violate the Fourth Amendment as an unreasonable search.

*In re Sean A., 191 Cal.App.4th 182 (California 12/22/10).

weapons
Share this
Judge Tom

The Author Judge Tom

Judge Tom is the founder and moderator of AsktheJudge.info. He is a retired juvenile judge and spent 23 years on the bench. He has written several books for lawyers and judges as well as teens and parents including 'Teen Cyberbullying Investigated' (Free Spirit Publishing) and 'Every Vote Matters: the Power of Your Voice, from Student Elections to the Supreme Court' (Free Spirit Publishing). In 2020, the American Bar Association published "Cyberbullying Law," the nation's first case-law book written for lawyers, judges and law students. When he's not answering teens' questions, Judge Tom volunteers with the American Red Cross and can be found hiking, traveling and reading.

Find great resources in our

Teen Help Network


Leave A Comment Cancel reply