Logo
  • Home
  • Ask
  • Teen Help Network
  • About
    • About Judge Tom
    • Books
    • FAQs
    • Press Room
  • Your Rights
    • Crime and Punishment
    • Student Rights at School
    • You and Your Body
    • You and the Internet
    • Juvenile Justice System
    • LGBT Youth Rights
    • More Categories
  • Blog
  • Get Help
    • Videos
    • A Teenager’s Guide to Juvenile Court
    • Books
    • Research & Resources
  • Newsletter Signup

 

Q&A

Know your rights! Youth justice and juvenile law answers.

Askthejudge.info features regular updates from the news, important decisions from the nation′s courts, and online discussions with Judge Tom. Find out everything you need to know about youth rights, juvenile law and juvenile justice. AsktheJudge – Empowering youth one question at a time.

Disclaimer: The information contained in this site is made available to the general public and is not intended to serve as legal advice.You should consult a trained legal professional in your area for questions you may have about the laws affecting juveniles or any legal interpretations.

Copyright, 2014
Logo
April 12, 2011
Judge Tom
Talk Back
6

Expelled for Facebook comment that teacher is bipolar

PreviousNext

Three students at Chapel Hill Middle School in Georgia were disciplined in March, 2011 for their posts on Facebook.


Although done at home, the students’ comments resulted in action by the school. Their parents are considering appealing the discipline through the district process and possibly taking legal action.


Alejandra Sosa wrote that the teacher was a child molester. “I was just expressing myself on Facebook, because like I said I was mad that day because of what he did…I had no intentions of ruining his reputation.” The honor roll student was suspended for ten days.


Seventh-grader, William Lambert III, was also suspended for posting about the same teacher that he was a rapist. A third unnamed student was expelled for adding that the teacher was bipolar.





Newtown Grafitti (Flickr)

One issue raised by the parents regards the authority of the school to discipline a student for what they do at home. Courts across the nation continue to debate this issue. Some courts have ruled for the student on the basis of free speech under the First Amendment. Others have ruled for the school, citing the Tinker decision of 1969.


Tinker created the standard for determining when student speech is protected. If it disrupts or has the potential to disrupt the school environment, or violates the rights of another, the speech is not protected. Otherwise, even if the speech is unpopular or a minority view, it is protected under the First Amendment.


Do you have an opinion about this issue? Should you be allowed to write or say anything you want when you’re off-campus without being disciplined by your school? Is all speech free in America or are there limits to protected speech?

Share this
Judge Tom

The Author Judge Tom

Judge Tom is the founder and moderator of AsktheJudge.info. He is a retired juvenile judge and spent 23 years on the bench. He has written several books for lawyers and judges as well as teens and parents including 'Teen Cyberbullying Investigated' (Free Spirit Publishing) and 'Every Vote Matters: the Power of Your Voice, from Student Elections to the Supreme Court' (Free Spirit Publishing). In 2020, the American Bar Association published "Cyberbullying Law," the nation's first case-law book written for lawyers, judges and law students. When he's not answering teens' questions, Judge Tom volunteers with the American Red Cross and can be found hiking, traveling and reading.

Find great resources in our

Teen Help Network


Leave A Comment Cancel reply

6 Comments

  • Beth W.
    August 2, 2011 2:39 pm count( 0 )

    The ‘child molester’ comment went way too far.

  • Oklahoma City Divorce Attorney Matt Ingham
    July 6, 2011 8:32 am count( 1 )

    Stating publicly on facebook that your teacher is a ‘child molester / rapists’ is crossing the line. Comments of that magnitude go far beyond the line ‘bad mouthing’ and are in the territory of libel/slander. Comments of that magnitude have the potential to permanently maim the teachers professional credientials and the most certainly have the potential to disrupt the school environment.