To help “break the ice and get comfortable in High School”, freshman Charlie Patton made a face for her high school yearbook. The photo was taken in August, 2009 with her mother present and agreeable with the shot. Fifteen year old Charlie explained “I wanted to show who I am. That’s Charlie. I wanted to be fun”. The photo you see here speaks for itself. Charlie goes to James Madison High School in Texas.
Charlie Patton
Just before Thanksgiving, Charlie was told that the photo would not be allowed in the yearbook. One administrator said it looked like it was gang related “because of how you throw up signs and everything.” No hands and arms are visible in the picture. The school released a statement that “since the yearbook represents the school and the students….students who make inappropriate faces or gestures….are asked to retake their photos free of charge.”
Charlie claims she was not given the chance for a second shot. She wears the photograph on her school identification around her neck and on a T-shirt.
In a case like this, where do you draw the line between making a face and making a threat of throwing gang signs? Is it possible for just a face shot? Aren’t school yearbooks supposed to be fun with a balance of serious, less serious and goofy shots?
Popularity: 4% [?]
seems a bit ridiculous given that there is nothing inappropriate in the picture
Clearly the administrator in question has never been to an innercity much less seen a gang sign.